Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • cdenver : Your questions are thoughtful and right-on. However there are no easy answers to your questions....
  • crawling : Great muscle building supplementsBodybuilding forum
  • Monsterboy : While I agree with the substance of your argument -- stealing is wrong, and cost should not...
  • Teeno : The security of Macs is actually quiet strong. Even before Snow Leopard the Mac OS runs many...
  • ... : Mood rings were one of the first commercial uses of liquid crystals... currently the dominant...
  • gary7 : I wonder what ever happened to the material used  for color in mood rings. They respond to heat...
  • kbillet : Hum! Stealing is Wrong! Yes! I agree! How about the guy whom creates a software that can make a...
  • dterry : Plants do not use soil carbon directly.  They obtain their carbon solely from carbon dioxide. ...
  • dmm : What a crock of BS!  People in countries like Pakistan (not to mention the U.S.) certainly DO...
  • ... : Diamonds are made from carbon and they don't bio degrade all that fast. Small tubes of carbon as...
Advertisement
Monday, March 09, 2009

Stem-Cell Restrictions Lifted

Obama also promises to return scientific integrity to government decision making.
By Emily Singer

Stem-cell scientists aren't the only ones celebrating today. In addition to signing an executive order that will lift federal funding restrictions for embryonic stem-cell research, President Obama signed a presidential memorandum aimed at restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. Hopefully, that will help bring an end to what has been broadly viewed as a dark time for science, with political and religious views hijacking high-level scientific discourse.

According to his statement, made earlier today,

This Order is an important step in advancing the cause of science in America. But let's be clear: promoting science isn't just about providing resources--it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient--especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda--and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.

By doing this, we will ensure America's continued global leadership in scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs. That is essential not only for our economic prosperity, but for the progress of all humanity.

That is why today, I am also signing a Presidential Memorandum directing the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop a strategy for restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. To ensure that in this new Administration, we base our public policies on the soundest science; that we appoint scientific advisors based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology; and that we are open and honest with the American people about the science behind our decisions. That is how we will harness the power of science to achieve our goals--to preserve our environment and protect our national security; to create the jobs of the future, and live longer, healthier lives.

You can read the full remarks here.

Doug Melton, codirector of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, has been instrumental in pushing stem-cell research forward despite funding restrictions. In a statement issued this morning, Melton gives a personal perspective on the difficulties of the past eight years:

On a personal level, it is an enormous relief and a time for celebration. It is a relief from the bureaucratic and accounting nightmares that have slowed our work, discouraged young scientists, and delayed progress for nearly 8 years. It is a relief to know that we can now collaborate openly and freely with other scientists in our own University and elsewhere, without restrictions on what equipment, data, or ideas can be shared. Science thrives when there is an open and collaborative exchange, not when there are artificial barriers, silos, constructed by the government.

But this is to me a day that marks an important change in spirit, in our national outlook. I think sometimes of how August 9, 2001 was a dark day for science and for America because political ideology was used to define how science should be done. I am going to gather my lab at 11:45 in our tea room to celebrate. And here I mean celebrate listening to our nation's leader, President Obama, state forcibly that science should guide policies, scientific facts should inform our thinking and decisions. Science as a way of knowing is a very powerful tool for good and it is liberating to hear that science, not political ideology, will guide the Obama Administration in its decisions. I was always uncomfortable being put in the position of being an opponent to my own government, being set up in opposition to what the previous Administration implied was an ethical approach to science when in fact it was not an ethical decision made on 8 August, 2001, but a political decision. I am deeply happy to say that those days are done.

Comments

  • Way to be even-handed!
    quote from Obama: 3 paragraphs
    quote from stem-cell supporter: 2 paragraphs
    quote from stem-cell opponent: nothing
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    03/09/2009
    Posts:186
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Way to be even-handed!
      Yes, but the quote from the opponents would be the drivel of religious fundamentalists. You really miss that?

      It would be the type of drivel claiming the "sanctity" of God's dominion, which we've heard ad nauseam since the time of Andreas Vesalius.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      gabrielg01
      03/09/2009
      Posts:381
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Way to be even-handed!
        Way to respect the scientific method, garbrialgo1. You arrogantly presume you know what the evidence is going to be and want to refuse to even allow it to be submitted for review.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        geraldwilhit...
        03/10/2009
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Way to be even-handed!
          This issue is not about the scientific method, but about science policy.

          And by the way, just as a side note, the scientific method is not democratic. You don't get to vote about the existence of gravity. So, please don't mix things up.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          gabrielg01
          03/10/2009
          Posts:381
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
  • One for Logic
    Finally a president who doesn't think the universe is 6,000 years old and that the Flintstones is documentary. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jmaximus9
    03/10/2009
    Posts:80
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: One for Logic
      It is disingenuous, and an exemplary straw man argument, for the President to claim that his new policy, unlike past policy, is free of ideology. Although I am an atheist who favors some forms of stem cell research, I can not dismiss unreflectively ethical questions raised by opponents. Moral implications and their social ramifications are inherent in any scientific endeavor. Should new stem cell lines derive solely from unused IVF embryos? Or should human embryos be created for the sole purpose of establishing new stem cell lines? If the technique for converting ordinary skin cells into induced pluripotent stem (ips) cells (techniques begun employing embryonic stem cell lines that the Bush administration had approved for federally funded research) prove successful--the journal Cell just published a paper demonstrating a new technique eliminating a major risk of the technique--should embryo-derived research then be limited? These are questions deserving of reflection. I can only hope that, once the NIH makes its recommendations, the administration will foster a deliberative ethical process.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rjp
      03/10/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: One for Logic
        Your questions are thoughtful and right-on. However there are no easy answers to your questions. I think the next five years of stem cell research should be monitored very closely by an appropriate watchdog group.

        Under Obama administration guidelines, stem cell research will get a big boost. The research program will move forward in the right direction. Recently, I am learning a lot about stem cell research. The motivation behind my interest in this subject was stimulated by a novel titled "AGELESS A Stem cell mystery". If anyone is interested, there is a website devoted to this book. The website address is:
             www.ageless-stemcellmystery.com
        Try it out. It may also stimulate your interest in this subject.

        http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/07/06/new-rules-could-further-expand-stem-cell-research/
        Rate this comment: 12345

        cdenver
        10/02/2009
        Posts:1
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review September/October 2009

Current Issue

The TR35
Technology Review presents its ninth annual list of leading young innovators.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.